#SIMILAR TO GIMP FOR MAC ANDROID#
In this scenario, Gimp is the Android camera and Pixelmator is the iPhone camera. Android had brightness settings, exposure, digital zoom, filters and more, and still couldn’t compete. For a long time, the iPhone’s camera was widely regarded as the best one in a smartphone, despite having virtually no customization options.
I realize that these are small examples in two very capable apps, but the experience throughout various tools and filters is very consistent. Good rendering is especially important if you’re one to share or upload photos, since compression can distort an image even further. Gimp’s smudge tool is a pixelated mess no matter what option I tweaked, but its opponent was silky smooth. Yes, Gimp may have 20 different ways to blur all or part of an image, but Pixelmator still manages to produce a better result. Here’s the catch though: Pixelmator has a tendency to outperform Gimp in almost every area anyway.
#SIMILAR TO GIMP FOR MAC FULL#
Pixelmator is less than a pleasant experience for users who want full control, rather than let the app do the work. Drag out from the click point to adjust tolerance for the surrounding area, but that’s all you’re going to get. The bucket/fill tool does exactly as advertised. Yes, there are other types of blurs, but aside from one or two sliders, that’s all the adjustment you get to play with. You can adjust the intensity, but that’s it. In Pixelmator, Gaussian blur is Gaussian blur. It’s easy to see how advanced photo editors and designers would have a field day. Even something as simple as the bucket/fill tool has fill types, affected area options, transparency options, modes, colors, patterns and thresholds to toy around with. It doesn’t just have Gaussian blur either, it has blur radius, horizontal and vertical, and blur method. Gimp doesn’t just have a blur tool, it has six different types of blurs. Believe it or not, for some people, particularly the pickiest perfectionists among us, that can come in handy. Gimp is Feature-Packed, but Pixelmator Tends to OutperformĮarlier I mentioned that Gimp looks like a haphazard mashup of tools on your display. The same situation occurs with power-hungry tools like heal, which is very laggy on Gimp. On Pixelmator with the same photo loaded, it’s instantaneous. Something as simple as making a magic wand selection on my MacBook Air takes seconds to load. Pixelmator elegantly presents the tools you probably need most and lets you dig around for the others if you require.Īnother sore point: Gimp’s performance. Gimp throws a lot of options at you at once and lets you play in the sandbox, while Pixelmator is far more clean, modern and sophisticated, and showcases a stark contrast in design approaches. It looks like someone vomited a slew of photography and design tools on your computer screen back in 2004 and never cleaned it up. It’s not just speed though: Pixelmator’s design is nothing short of gorgeous. If you lack experience in the graphic design or photography departments, Gimp is extremely intimidating.
#SIMILAR TO GIMP FOR MAC MAC#
Pixelmator loads within seconds as any other app should, while Gimp has an archaic load screen and as a result, takes way too long to load for a modern Mac app. However, if you’re already accustomed to using Photoshop, you may not see this as a problem since Photoshop itself isn’t exactly winning any races either. Gimp, it’s not even a question: Pixelmator gives a much better first impression for several reasons.
But how do they stack up against each other? Pixelmator Gives a Far Better First Impressionįirst impressions aren’t everything, but they can offer some valuable insight.
For casual users and even some advanced users, it’s already been established that both of these are viable alternatives to Photoshop. Gimp, on the other hand, is completely free to download. The former is a well-regarded app in the Mac App Store for $29.99, and that’s just a one-time payment as opposed to Photoshop’s monthly charge.
0 kommentar(er)
